GRVT and Hyperliquid: Compared

GRVT and Hyperliquid: Compared

GRVT is designed from the ground up with institutional-grade infrastructure in mind, with the aim to benefit the mass, prioritizing security, compliance, and efficiency. Its hybrid model addresses the limitations of both centralized and purely decentralized exchanges, making it a more attractive option for institutional players and mainstream adoption. 

Here’s how GRVT's model stands out:

Hybrid Fund Movement (Speed & Security):

GRVT:

  • Employs a clear separation: on-chain for settlements/disputes (security, transparency), off-chain for trading (speed, low latency).
  • Leverages Ethereum and its own L2 for on-chain operations.
  • Focuses on delivering TradFi-level performance with DeFi security.

Hyperliquid:

  • Primarily operates off-chain for speed, which is great for traders, but it relies on its own centralized sequencer.
  • While it has on chain settlement, the core trading engine is off chain.
  • This introduces a higher degree of counterparty risk compared to GRVT's hybrid approach, as institutions must trust Hyperliquid's sequencer.

GRVT's Advantage: GRVT's dual-layered approach provides a more robust and transparent system, mitigating counterparty risk and aligning with institutional risk management requirements.

Hybrid Account Management (Security & Simplicity):

GRVT:

  • Combines Web2 onboarding (email, OAuth) for KYC and portfolio tracking with SecureKey (MPC, biometrics) for self-custodial trading.
  • Offers the convenience of Web2 with the security of Web3.
  • Institutions maintain full control of their funds.

Hyperliquid:

  • Relies on standard Web3 wallet connections.
  • While self custody is present, it does not combine the web2 features with the web3 security in the same way GRVT does.
  • Does not have the same level of compliance focused user on boarding.

GRVT's Advantage: GRVT simplifies institutional onboarding and provides a more secure trading environment by integrating familiar Web2 methods with advanced self-custody solutions, addressing a critical institutional pain point.

RegDeFi (Compliance & Transparency):

GRVT:

  • Pioneers RegDeFi, balancing regulatory compliance with DeFi principles.
  • On-chain settlements ensure auditable records and mitigate counterparty risk.
  • Designed to bridge the gap between traditional finance and DeFi.

Hyperliquid:

  • Focuses primarily on decentralized trading, with less emphasis on formal regulatory compliance.
  • While it has on-chain settlement, the exchange itself is not built from the ground up with regulatory compliance as a primary focus.
  • This can be a significant barrier for institutional adoption.

GRVT's Advantage: GRVT's RegDeFi framework provides the necessary regulatory certainty and transparency for institutional participants, a crucial factor that Hyperliquid currently lacks.

Web3 Security (Process & Audits):

GRVT:

  • Emphasizes rigorous verification processes and continuous security audits.
  • Implements MFA, HSMs, and secure enclaves for enhanced security.
  • Focuses on the process, not just the cryptographic controls.

Hyperliquid:

  • Relies on standard Web3 security practices.
  • While secure, it does not show the same level of focus on process and institutional grade security that GRVT does.
  • While audits are important, the processes surrounding the audits, and the security of the human element are also extremely important.

GRVT's Advantage: GRVT's comprehensive security approach, including process-driven verification and institutional-grade safeguards, provides a more robust and reliable trading environment.

Hybrid Security Model (Self-Custody & Institutional Controls):

GRVT:

  • Combines Web2 authentication with Web3 control, ensuring only authorized users can perform critical actions.
  • Uses EIP-712 signatures and on-chain smart contracts for transparent and secure transactions.
  • Guarantees self-custody, even in extreme scenarios.

Hyperliquid:

  • Relies on standard Web3 wallet connections, which may not offer the same level of granular control and auditability.
  • While self custody is present, it does not have the same level of institutional control.

GRVT's Advantage: GRVT's hybrid security model offers a superior balance of self-custody and institutional controls, providing a more secure and auditable trading environment.

Get the latest updates directly to your inbox.